No-Cost, No-Obligation Essure Lawsuit Review

Information about Essure Claims from Lawyers Handling Essure Lawsuits in

 Essure Attorneys
Essure Lawsuit News

Suffering Essure Women Are The FDA's Long-Term Study

No pre-market long-term studies of Essure's safety were ever conducted as the device was rushed to market

Friday, August 23, 2019 - The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is being accused of failing to adequately test the Essure birth control device before allowing it to be sold. Essure was approved by the FDA on November 4, 2002. On June 5, 2013, Bayer acquired Essure's maker Conceptus Inc. Essure was approved as a Class III medical device and according to the FDA, received the agency's "most stringent review before marketing, using the Pre-market Approval process." The FDA considers Class III devices to "present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury, and that general and special controls alone are insufficient to assure the safety and effectiveness." Essure is also subject to an FDA post-market approval process and over 25,000 adverse events have been reported to the FDA. Post-market testing of Essure is currently ongoing, and no conclusions have been reached. Essure sales were discontinued as of the end of 2018. The number and magnitude of medical problems that Essure has caused lead many to believe that the FDA pre and post-market testing was grossly inadequate. Essure birth control lawsuits Essure lawsuits against the drug maker Bayer HealthCare are being filed by our firm for clients nationwide.

Essure birth control is not always effective and women who have become pregnant while on Essure are sharing their horror stories on social media. One woman recently reported that her Essure birth control device was unsafe and did not prevent her from becoming pregnant. The woman became pregnant five years after first having Essure implanted an and was forced to have a suction and D & C to remove the fetus that had developed ectopically. Unfortunately, the abortion also seems to have dislodged her Essure coil that subsequently migrated to the ovary causing severe pain and constant bleeding. In conclusion, the woman was required to have a laparoscopic hysterectomy and rendered permanently sterile, quite a stretch from the "performed in the comfort and convenience without surgery" promise in which Essure was originally sold to her.

Another woman tweeted that she became pregnant when Essure coils moved and migrated from the Fallopian tubes immediately after having had an MRI for another medical problem. Women are reporting that Essure has led to depression, weight gain, hair loss, and dried skin. Women are experiencing psychological trauma when they realize that they are now forced to have a hysterectomy as surgically removing their reproductive organs make them no longer feel like they are a woman. Women are outraged when they are told that Essure was approved by the FDA based on studies of fewer than 1000 patients and in less than two years. No long term studies of Essure were ever conducted. Instead, Essure women "are the studies."

Essure's testing has failed to anticipate that the device can be altered by other medical testing equipment. Women are reporting not only becoming pregnant but also experiencing constant sharp pain and bleeding from having their uterus lacerated by the Essure coil. Over 40,000 women have written about their adverse Essure experiences on the Facebook Group "Essure Problems."

More Recent Essure Complications Lawsuit News:

Essure Lawsuits: No Fees Unless We Collect for You

We will represent all persons involved in an Essure lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning our attorneys charge never charge any legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. For a free no-obligation consultation please fill out our short online contact form and one of our Essure lawyers will contact you to answer any of your questions.

No-Cost, No-Obligation Essure Lawsuit Case Review If You or a Loved One Suffered from Essure Problems

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. OnderLaw has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.